This article will be comparing two of the 5G smartphone devices released by Vivo and Samsung respectively this year, in 2023.
Let’s compare the Vivo T2 5G and the Samsung Galaxy M34 5G smartphones, and find out which among them is the best.
Vivo T2 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M34 5G
General
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.5 x 7.8 mm | 161.7 x 77.2 x 8.8 mm |
| Weight | 172 gm | 208 gm |
Connectivity
| Network Connectivity | 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G | 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G |
| Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac with Dual Band Support | Yes, Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac with Dual Band Support and Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | Yes, Version 5.1 | Yes, Version 5.3 |
Processor
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Chipset |
| Primary Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Operating System | Android 13 based Funtouch OS 13 | Android 13 based One UI 5.1 |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 |
Storage
| Storage Options | 6GB/128GB and 8GB/128GB | 6GB/128GB and 8GB/128GB |
Display
| Display Type | AMOLED Display | Super AMOLED Display |
| Screen Size | 6.38” | 6.5” |
| Screen Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 64MP + 2MP Dual Camera Setup | 50MP + 8MP + 2MP Triple Camera Setup |
| Front Camera | 16MP | 13MP |
Sensors
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Under Display, Optical Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side Mounted Fingerprint Sensor |
| Accelerometer | Yes | Yes |
| Proximity Sensor | Yes | Yes |
| Gyroscope | Yes | Yes |
| Barometer | No | No |
| Compass | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Battery Backup | 4500 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Charging Features | 44W Wired Fast Charging Feature | 25W Wired Fast Charging Feature |
Colors
| Color Variant | Nitro Blaze and Velocity Wave | Midnight Blue, Prism Silver and Waterfall Blue |
Both the smartphones in this comparison have their own pros and cons, making it difficult to pick one among them as the best.
If you look at the processors used within the two devices, the Galaxy M34 5G from Samsung is powered by the brand’s own Exynos 1280 chipset and has a primary clock speed of 2.4 GHz. Vivo’s T2 5G is equipped with the Snapdragon 695 5G chipset with a primary clock speed of 2.2 GHz. The Galaxy smartphone, in comparison, will be able to offer a better performance than the Vivo T2 5G device.
Coming to the displays, Samsung’s Galaxy M34 5G has a larger 6.5″ Super AMOLED display screen, while the Vivo T2 5G smartphone features a smaller 6.38″ AMOLED display panel. Both smartphone devices have similar screen resolutions(1080 x 2400 pixels), but the Galaxy smartphone supports the fastest refresh rate(120 Hz).
About the cameras, Vivo’s T2 5G only has a dual camera setup, whereas Samsung’s Galaxy M34 5G has a triple camera unit. However, it should be noted that the Vivo smartphone has a better 64MP main camera when compared to the 50MP primary shooter offered on the Galaxy device. Both the devices also have additional 2MP cameras, and the Galaxy M34 5G comes with an 8MP ultrawide camera.
Even for the front-facing cameras too, Vivo’s T2 5G has a better 16MP front camera than the 13MP selfie cam offered on the Galaxy device.
Finally, regarding the battery backup, Samsung’s Galaxy M34 5G smartphone packs a larger 6000 mAh battery, while the Vivo T2 5G device is backed by a 4500 mAh battery. But it should again be noted that when it comes to the fast charge features offered, Vivo’s T2 5G has a faster wired fast charge feature of 44W. The Galaxy smartphone only has a 25W wired fast charging support.
So, for the verdict. Samsung’s Galaxy M34 5G smartphone is the best when it comes to processor, display, and battery backup. The T2 5G smartphone from Vivo, on the other hand, has better rear & front cameras, as well as a faster wired charging feature.
